Kia Optima 2010 vs Kia Optima 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 165 HP | 165 HP | |
Torque: | 198 NM | 196 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Kia Optima 2010 and Kia Optima 2013 have the same engine power, but Kia Optima 2010 torque is 2 NM more than Kia Optima 2013. Kia Optima 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.0 | |
The Kia Optima 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Optima 2010 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Optima 2013, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Optima 2010 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
Kia Optima 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 390'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.85 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Kia Optima 2010 and Kia Optima 2013 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 436 litres | 505 litres | |
Kia Optima 2013 has more luggage space. Kia Optima 2010 has 69 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima 2013. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Optima 2010 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Kia Optima 2013. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 7800 | 9200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Kia Optima has
| |