Kia Optima 2010 vs Kia Optima 2013

 
Kia Optima
2010 - 2013
Kia Optima
2013 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 165 HP165 HP
Torque: 198 NM196 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds9.5 seconds
Kia Optima 2010 and Kia Optima 2013 have the same engine power, but Kia Optima 2010 torque is 2 NM more than Kia Optima 2013. Kia Optima 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.97.0
The Kia Optima 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Kia Optima 2010 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Optima 2013, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Optima 2010 could require 135 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 880 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
Kia Optima 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 390'000 km390'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 6 years6 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.85 m4.85 m
Width: 1.83 m1.83 m
Height: 1.46 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Kia Optima 2010 and Kia Optima 2013 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 436 litres505 litres
Kia Optima 2013 has more luggage space.
Kia Optima 2010 has 69 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima 2013.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Optima 2010 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Kia Optima 2013.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9802`000
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 80009800
Pros and Cons: Kia Optima has
  • lower price
Kia Optima has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv