Kia Optima 2013 vs Skoda Superb 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is a more dynamic driving. Kia Optima engine produces 13 HP more power than Skoda Superb, but torque is 54 NM less than Skoda Superb. Despite the higher power, Kia Optima reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.1 | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Optima consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Optima could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Kia Optima gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Optima and Skoda Superb are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 595 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Kia Optima has 90 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 0.3 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`071 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Skoda Superb scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |