Kia Optima 2018 vs Skoda Superb 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 134 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Kia Optima engine produces 6 HP less power than Skoda Superb, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Optima is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Optima consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that by driving the Kia Optima over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Optima consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1590 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1660 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 1180 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Optima gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 565 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Kia Optima can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | 2`117 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
| |