Kia Optima 2016 vs Mazda 6 2015

 
Kia Optima
2016 - 2018
Mazda 6
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 245 HP150 HP
Torque: 353 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.4 seconds10.5 seconds
Kia Optima is more dynamic to drive.
Kia Optima engine produces 95 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 143 NM more than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Kia Optima reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.26.1
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Kia Optima consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Optima could require 315 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle1010 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1260 km on highway
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Engine production duration: 14 years12 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Kia Sorento, Hyundai i30Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5, Mazda CX-3
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Optima might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Mazda 6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.86 m4.87 m
Width: 1.86 m1.84 m
Height: 1.49 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Kia Optima is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 2 cm wider, while the height of Kia Optima is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 510 litres438 litres
Kia Optima has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Kia Optima has 72 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. The Mazda 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda 6.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1201`965
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 12 60017 800
Pros and Cons: Kia Optima has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv