Kia Optima 2016 vs Chrysler 200 2014
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 245 HP | 187 HP | |
Torque: | 353 NM | 234 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 9 seconds | |
Kia Optima is more dynamic to drive. Kia Optima engine produces 58 HP more power than Chrysler 200, whereas torque is 119 NM more than Chrysler 200. Thanks to more power Kia Optima reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.5 | |
Kia Optima consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 200, which means that by driving the Kia Optima over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
1140 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Kia Optima gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Kia Sorento, Hyundai i30 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Renegade | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Optima might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.86 m | 4.89 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.49 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Kia Optima is 3 cm shorter than the Chrysler 200, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 453 litres | |
Kia Optima has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Optima has 57 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 200. The Chrysler 200 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 1.2 metres less than that of the Chrysler 200, which means Kia Optima can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 2`092 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 11 800 | 10 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Chrysler 200 has
| |