Kia Optima 2013 vs Volvo S80 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 278 HP | 203 HP | |
Torque: | 365 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
Kia Optima engine produces 75 HP more power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Volvo S80. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 1 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Kia Sorento, Hyundai i30 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S60, Volvo XC60, Volvo V60 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Optima might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.85 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
Kia Optima is smaller. Kia Optima and Volvo S80 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 436 litres | 480 litres | |
Volvo S80 has more luggage space. Kia Optima has 44 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S80. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo S80, which means Kia Optima can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 2`130 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 9200 | 5600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |