Kia Optima 2013 vs Volvo S80 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 48 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Optima engine produces 155 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, Kia Optima reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 8.4 | |
|
The Kia Optima is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Optima consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Kia Optima over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Kia Optima gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Kia Optima is smaller. Kia Optima and Volvo S80 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 381 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Volvo S80 has more luggage space. Kia Optima has 99 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S80. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo S80, which means Kia Optima can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |