Kia Optima 2013 vs Kia Optima 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 48 HP | 274 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Kia Optima 2013 engine produces 226 HP less power than Kia Optima 2010, whereas torque is 185 NM less than Kia Optima 2010. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 8.8 | |
|
The Kia Optima 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Optima 2013 consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Optima 2010, which means that by driving the Kia Optima 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 555 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Kia Optima 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Optima 2013 and Kia Optima 2010 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 381 litres | 436 litres | |
|
Kia Optima 2010 has more luggage space. Kia Optima 2013 has 55 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima 2010. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Optima 2013 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Kia Optima 2010, which means Kia Optima 2013 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`980 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Kia Optima has
| |