Kia Optima 2000 vs Mazda Demio 2000
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 134 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 169 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 16.1 seconds | |
| Kia Optima engine produces 59 HP more power than Mazda Demio, whereas torque is 53 NM more than Mazda Demio. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 43 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Kia Optima is larger, but lower. Kia Optima is 91 cm longer than the Mazda Demio, 15 cm wider, while the height of Kia Optima is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1298 litres | |
|
Kia Optima has more luggage capacity. Kia Optima has 149 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Demio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mazda Demio, which means Kia Optima can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Mazda Demio has
| |