Kia Optima 2000 vs Subaru Legacy 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 151 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 216 NM | 226 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Kia Optima engine produces 14 HP less power than Subaru Legacy, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Subaru Legacy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Kia Optima is larger, but slightly lower. Kia Optima is 7 cm longer than the Subaru Legacy, 9 cm wider, while the height of Kia Optima is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 433 litres | |
|
Subaru Legacy has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Optima has 65 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Legacy. This could mean that the Kia Optima uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 0.4 metres less than that of the Subaru Legacy, which means Kia Optima can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Subaru Legacy has
| |