Kia Optima 2000 vs Subaru Impreza 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 151 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 216 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
| Kia Optima engine produces 26 HP more power than Subaru Impreza, whereas torque is 32 NM more than Subaru Impreza. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 50 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Kia Optima is larger, but slightly lower. Kia Optima is 31 cm longer than the Subaru Impreza, 8 cm wider, while the height of Kia Optima is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`885 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Subaru Impreza has
| |