Kia Optima 2000 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1991

 
Kia Optima
2000 - 2005
Mitsubishi Pajero
1991 - 1997
Body: SedanCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 151 HP147 HP
Torque: 216 NM211 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Kia Optima engine produces 4 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no datano data
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres75 litres

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.73 m4.66 m
Width: 1.82 m1.70 m
Height: 1.41 m1.86 m
Kia Optima is larger, but lower.
Kia Optima is 8 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 13 cm wider, while the height of Kia Optima is 45 cm lower.
Seats: no data7 seats
Trunk capacity: 368 litres1080 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data1080 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 368 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2050 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 1.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Kia Optima can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8852`650
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data3600
Pros and Cons: Kia Optima has
  • better manoeuvrability
Mitsubishi Pajero has
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv