Kia Optima 2000 vs Ford Mondeo 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 151 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 216 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Kia Optima engine produces 19 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Ford Mondeo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 59 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ford Mondeo 2003 2.5 engine: The LCBD engine features a multi-point fuel injection system, where each cylinder is equipped with its own injector for precise fuel delivery. This system is highly durable and reliable, with a low likelihood of ... More about Ford Mondeo 2003 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Optima and Ford Mondeo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 500 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Kia Optima has 132 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Kia Optima can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`885 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |