Kia Optima 2000 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2006

 
Kia Optima
2000 - 2005
Chevrolet Captiva
2006 - 2011
Body: SedanCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 151 HP136 HP
Torque: 216 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds11.5 seconds
Kia Optima engine produces 15 HP more power than Chevrolet Captiva, but torque is 4 NM less than Chevrolet Captiva.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data9.3
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres65 litres

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.73 m4.64 m
Width: 1.82 m1.85 m
Height: 1.41 m1.72 m
Kia Optima is 9 cm longer than the Chevrolet Captiva, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Optima is 31 cm lower.
Seats: no data7 seats
Trunk capacity: 368 litres465 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data465 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 368 litres465 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data930 litres
In 5-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 97 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters12.1 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 1.7 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Kia Optima can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8852`405
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): no data4400
Pros and Cons: Kia Optima has
  • more power
  • better manoeuvrability
Chevrolet Captiva has
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv