Kia Optima 2016 vs Skoda Superb 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Kia Optima engine produces 1 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Skoda Superb. Despite the higher power, Kia Optima reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1520 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1660 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 1070 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Optima gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Kia Optima is larger. Kia Optima is 2 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 553 litres | 603 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Optima has 50 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. This could mean that the Kia Optima uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Kia Optima can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`150 | 2`117 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |