Kia Optima 2016 vs Skoda Superb 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 141 HP | 220 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
Skoda Superb is a more dynamic driving. Kia Optima engine produces 79 HP less power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Skoda Superb. Due to the lower power, Kia Optima reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 6.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
The Kia Optima is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Optima consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that by driving the Kia Optima over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Optima consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1520 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
1660 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
1070 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
Kia Optima gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.86 m | 4.86 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Kia Optima and Skoda Superb are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 553 litres | 660 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | no data | |
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Kia Optima has 107 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`150 | 2`090 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 15 000 | 13 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |