Kia Optima 2018 vs Infiniti Q50 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
| Kia Optima engine produces 34 HP more power than Infiniti Q50, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Infiniti Q50. Despite the higher power, Kia Optima reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.0 | |
|
The Infiniti Q50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Optima consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Infiniti Q50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Optima could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| Infiniti Q50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Kia Optima) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Infiniti Q50) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Kia Optima is larger. Kia Optima is 5 cm longer than the Infiniti Q50, 4 cm wider, while the height of Kia Optima is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 500 litres | |
| Kia Optima has 10 litres more trunk space than the Infiniti Q50. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 1.3 metres less than that of the Infiniti Q50, which means Kia Optima can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Infiniti Q50 has
| |