Kia Optima 2018 vs Mazda 3 2019

 
Kia Optima
2018 - 2020
Mazda 3
2019 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP122 HP
Torque: 196 NM213 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds10.8 seconds
Kia Optima is more dynamic to drive.
Kia Optima engine produces 28 HP more power than Mazda 3, but torque is 17 NM less than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Kia Optima reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.85.5
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Kia Optima consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Optima could require 345 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 890 km in combined cycle920 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway1100 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.86 m4.66 m
Width: 1.86 m1.80 m
Height: 1.49 m1.44 m
Kia Optima is larger.
Kia Optima is 20 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 6 cm wider, while the height of Kia Optima is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 510 litres450 litres
Kia Optima has more luggage capacity.
Kia Optima has 60 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 10.9 metersno data
Gross weight: 2`020 kg1`902 kg
Net weight:1`586 kg1`383 kg
Load capacity:434 kg519 kg
Kia Optima load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem less than Mazda 3. Therefore, Mazda 3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 12 60015 400
Pros and Cons: Kia Optima has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv