Kia Optima 2000 vs Subaru Impreza 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Kia Optima is available with front wheel drive, while Subaru Impreza can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.7 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 134 - 181 HP | 95 - 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 169 - 245 NM | 143 - 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 10.6 seconds | 5.5 - 15.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 10.4 | 8.2 - 11.1 | |
|
Kia Optima petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Impreza. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Kia Optima is larger, but slightly lower. Kia Optima is 31 cm longer than the Subaru Impreza, 8 cm wider, while the height of Kia Optima is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 395 litres | |
|
Kia Optima has more luggage capacity. Kia Optima has 84 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Impreza. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 0.6 metres less than that of the Subaru Impreza, which means Kia Optima can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`903 | ~ 1`280 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Subaru Impreza has
| |