Kia Optima 2000 vs Mazda Demio 1997

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Kia Optima
2000 - 2005
Mazda Demio
1997 - 2003
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.71.3 - 1.5

Performance

Power: 134 - 181 HP63 - 75 HP
Torque: 169 - 245 NM103 - 116 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 - 10.6 seconds13 - 16.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.1 - 10.46.0 - 7.9
Kia Optima petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda Demio.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.73 m3.82 m
Width: 1.82 m1.67 m
Height: 1.41 m1.54 m
Kia Optima is larger, but lower.
Kia Optima is 91 cm longer than the Mazda Demio, 16 cm wider, while the height of Kia Optima is 13 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 479 litres330 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1298 litres
Kia Optima has more luggage capacity.
Kia Optima has 149 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Demio.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters9.2 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mazda Demio, which means Kia Optima can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`903~ 1`475
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons: Kia Optima has
  • roomier boot
Mazda Demio has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv