Kia Optima 2000 vs Kia Magentis 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.7 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 134 - 181 HP | 136 - 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 169 - 245 NM | 177 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 10.6 seconds | 8.5 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 10.4 | 8.6 - 10.3 | |
|
Kia Optima petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Magentis. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Optima and Kia Magentis are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 1.2 metres less than that of the Kia Magentis, which means Kia Optima can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`903 | ~ 1`993 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Kia Magentis has
| |