Kia Optima 2005 vs Mazda 6 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Kia Optima is available only with front wheel drive, while Mazda 6 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.7 | 1.8 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 188 HP | 120 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 - 305 NM | 165 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 11.7 seconds | 6.6 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 9.2 | 6.0 - 10.2 | |
|
Kia Optima petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6. On average, Kia Optima equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Kia Optima is larger. Kia Optima is 4 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 3 cm wider, while the height of Kia Optima is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 496 litres | 501 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
816 litres | no data | |
| Kia Optima has 5 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`013 | ~ 1`934 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |