Kia Optima 2005 vs Kia RIO 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.7 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Kia Optima is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 188 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 - 305 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 11.7 seconds | 12.3 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 9.2 | 6.2 - 7.2 | |
|
Kia Optima petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia RIO. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Kia Optima is larger. Kia Optima is 50 cm longer than the Kia RIO, 11 cm wider, while the height of Kia Optima is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 496 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
816 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`013 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Kia RIO has
| |