Kia Optima 2010 vs Volkswagen Passat 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol) | 1.4 - 3.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 - 274 HP | 105 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 - 365 NM | 200 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 10.9 seconds | 5.5 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 - 8.8 | 4.3 - 7.7 | |
|
Kia Optima petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Passat. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Optima is 8 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 1 cm wider, while the height of Kia Optima is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 436 litres | 565 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Optima has 129 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat. This could mean that the Kia Optima uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Kia Optima can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`994 | ~ 2`078 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |