Kia Optima 2010 vs Kia Cerato 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 - 274 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 - 365 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 10.9 seconds | 10.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 - 8.8 | 6.6 - 7.0 | |
|
Kia Optima petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Cerato. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Kia Optima is larger, but slightly lower. Kia Optima is 32 cm longer than the Kia Cerato, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 436 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`994 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Kia Cerato has
| |