Kia Optima 2013 vs Volvo S80 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Kia Optima is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo S80 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.7 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.6 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 48 - 278 HP | 109 - 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 - 365 NM | 185 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 11.6 seconds | 6.9 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 8.1 | 4.9 - 11.3 | |
|
Kia Optima petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S80. On average, Kia Optima equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Kia Optima is smaller. Kia Optima and Volvo S80 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Kia Optima has more luggage capacity. Kia Optima has 25 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo S80, which means Kia Optima can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`049 | ~ 2`168 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |