Kia Optima 2016 vs Renault Megane 2020
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.7 - 2.0 | 1.3 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 245 HP | 92 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 - 353 NM | 144 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 11.1 seconds | 8.6 - 11.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.4 - 8.2 | no data | |
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Megane can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
| Kia Optima is 23 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Optima is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 553 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1504 litres | |
|
Kia Optima has more luggage capacity. Kia Optima has 32 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Optima (by 182 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Kia Optima can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`152 | ~ 1`933 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 17 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Renault Megane has
| |