Kia Optima 2016 vs Fiat Tipo 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.7 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Kia Optima is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 245 HP | 95 - 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 - 353 NM | 127 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 11.1 seconds | 9.6 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.4 - 8.2 | 3.4 - 6.3 | |
|
Kia Optima petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Fiat Tipo. On average, Kia Optima equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Tipo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Kia Optima is larger, but lower. Kia Optima is 28 cm longer than the Fiat Tipo, 7 cm wider, while the height of Kia Optima is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 553 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | no data | |
| Kia Optima has 3 litres more trunk space than the Fiat Tipo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`152 | ~ 1`878 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Fiat Tipo has
| |