Kia Optima 2018 vs Infiniti Q50 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Kia Optima is available only with front wheel drive, while Infiniti Q50 can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.0 - 3.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 245 HP | 68 - 405 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 - 353 NM | 350 - 475 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 10.7 seconds | 5.1 - 8.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.6 - 8.5 | 5.1 - 10.8 | |
|
Kia Optima petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Infiniti Q50. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Kia Optima is larger. Kia Optima is 5 cm longer than the Infiniti Q50, 4 cm wider, while the height of Kia Optima is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 500 litres | |
| Kia Optima has 10 litres more trunk space than the Infiniti Q50. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 1.3 metres less than that of the Infiniti Q50, which means Kia Optima can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`077 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Infiniti Q50 has
| |