Kia Optima 2015 vs Chrysler 200 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kia Optima is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Chrysler 200 is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Kia Optima is available only with front wheel drive, while Chrysler 200 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.7 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.4 - 3.6 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 245 HP | 187 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 - 353 NM | 234 - 355 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 11 seconds | 6.5 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.6 - 8.3 | 8.5 - 10.2 | |
|
Kia Optima petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Chrysler 200 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Kia Optima is 3 cm shorter than the Chrysler 200, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 463 litres | |
|
Kia Optima has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Kia Optima has 47 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 200. The Chrysler 200 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Optima is 1.2 metres less than that of the Chrysler 200, which means Kia Optima can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`077 | ~ 2`141 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Optima has
|
Chrysler 200 has
| |