Kia Opirus 2006 vs Jaguar XJR 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 4.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 266 HP | 395 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 5.3 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJR is a more dynamic driving. Kia Opirus engine produces 129 HP less power than Jaguar XJR, whereas torque is 187 NM less than Jaguar XJR. Due to the lower power, Kia Opirus reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 12.1 | |
|
The Kia Opirus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Opirus consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJR, which means that by driving the Kia Opirus over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XJR gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Kia Opirus) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XJR) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Kia Sorento, Hyundai Grandeur, Kia Mohave, Hyundai ix55 | Used also on Jaguar XKR | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Opirus might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.31 m | |
| Kia Opirus is 5 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJR, 5 cm wider, while the height of Kia Opirus is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
450 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Kia Opirus has 20 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XJR. The Jaguar XJR may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`270 | 2`263 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Opirus has
|
Jaguar XJR has
| |