Kia Opirus 2003 vs Jaguar XJR 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Kia Opirus is available with front wheel drive, while Jaguar XJR can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.5 - 3.8 | 4.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 - 266 HP | 395 HP | |
| Torque: | 298 - 353 NM | 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 9.2 seconds | 5.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 - 11.4 | 12.1 | |
|
Kia Opirus petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XJR. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.98 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.31 m | |
| Kia Opirus is 5 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJR, 5 cm wider, while the height of Kia Opirus is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
450 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Kia Opirus has 20 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XJR. The Jaguar XJR may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`262 | ~ 2`263 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Opirus has
|
| |