Kia Mohave 2017 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 549 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Kia Mohave is more dynamic to drive. Kia Mohave engine produces 77 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 139 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Kia Mohave reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.1 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Mohave consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Mohave could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 217 mm (8.5 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 500'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia Mohave engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Toyota Hilux | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Kia Mohave engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 3.0 engine: The engine tends to be noisy and vibrate.
Nozzle life is limited when using poor quality fuel.
Increased oil consumption tends to occur over time. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Kia Mohave is larger, but lower. Kia Mohave is 17 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 3 cm wider, while the height of Kia Mohave is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1930 litres | |
|
Kia Mohave has more luggage capacity. Kia Mohave has 246 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Mohave is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Kia Mohave can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`164 | 2`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 18 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Mohave has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |