Kia Clarus 1997 vs Alfa Romeo 164 1992
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 133 HP | 146 HP | |
Torque: | 171 NM | 187 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
Alfa Romeo 164 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Clarus engine produces 13 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 164, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Alfa Romeo 164. Due to the lower power, Kia Clarus reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 8.2 | |
The Alfa Romeo 164 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Clarus consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 164, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Clarus could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
750 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
Alfa Romeo 164 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 4.56 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
Kia Clarus is larger. Kia Clarus is 14 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 164, 1 cm wider, while the height of Kia Clarus is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 424 litres | 505 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
764 litres | no data | |
Alfa Romeo 164 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Clarus has 81 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 164. This could mean that the Kia Clarus uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Clarus is 0.2 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 164. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`950 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Alfa Romeo 164 has
| |