Kia Clarus 1996 vs Alfa Romeo 164 1993

 
Kia Clarus
1996 - 1999
Alfa Romeo 164
1993 - 1994
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 116 HP146 HP
Torque: 152 NM187 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds9.9 seconds
Alfa Romeo 164 is a more dynamic driving.
Kia Clarus engine produces 30 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 164, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Alfa Romeo 164. Due to the lower power, Kia Clarus reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.38.2
The Alfa Romeo 164 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Kia Clarus consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 164, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Clarus could require 165 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
760 km on highway1070 km on highway
Alfa Romeo 164 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.56 m
Width: 1.77 m1.76 m
Height: 1.42 m1.39 m
Kia Clarus is larger.
Kia Clarus is 14 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 164, 1 cm wider, while the height of Kia Clarus is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 424 litres505 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
764 litresno data
Alfa Romeo 164 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Kia Clarus has 81 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 164. This could mean that the Kia Clarus uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Clarus is 0.2 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 164.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7501`950
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons:
    Alfa Romeo 164 has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv