Kia Clarus 1999 vs Kia Optima 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Kia Clarus
1999 - 2001
Kia Optima
2000 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.01.8 - 2.7

Performance

Power: 116 - 133 HP134 - 181 HP
Torque: 152 - 171 NM169 - 245 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 - 13.9 seconds8.5 - 10.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.3 - 11.19.1 - 10.4
Kia Clarus petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Optima.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.73 m4.73 m
Width: 1.77 m1.82 m
Height: 1.42 m1.41 m
Kia Clarus and Kia Optima are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 444 litres479 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
784 litresno data
Kia Optima has more luggage space.
Kia Clarus has 35 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Clarus is 0.2 metres more than that of the Kia Optima.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`760~ 1`903
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no datano data
Pros and Cons:
    Kia Optima has
    • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
    • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv