Kia Clarus 1996 vs Mazda 626 1995

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Kia Clarus
1996 - 1999
Mazda 626
1995 - 1998
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol)1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 116 - 133 HP76 - 117 HP
Torque: 152 - 171 NM158 - 173 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 - 13.9 seconds10.7 - 14.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.3 - 12.06.8 - 8.3
Kia Clarus petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.70 m
Width: 1.77 m1.75 m
Height: 1.42 m1.40 m
Both cars are similar in size. Kia Clarus and Mazda 626 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 424 litres452 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
764 litresno data
Mazda 626 has more luggage space.
Kia Clarus has 28 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`760~ 1`663
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data600
Pros and Cons: Kia Clarus has
  • only petrol engines available
Mazda 626 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv