Kia Clarus 1996 vs Jaguar XJ 1997

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Kia Clarus
1996 - 1999
Jaguar XJ
1997 - 2003
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticAutomatic
Kia Clarus is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Jaguar XJ is available only with automatic gearbox.
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Kia Clarus is available with front wheel drive, while Jaguar XJ can be equipped with rear wheel drive.
Engines: 1.8 - 2.03.2 - 4.0

Performance

Power: 116 - 133 HP240 - 370 HP
Torque: 152 - 171 NM316 - 525 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 - 13.9 seconds5.6 - 8.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.3 - 12.011.9 - 13.1
Kia Clarus petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XJ.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m5.02 m
Width: 1.77 m1.80 m
Height: 1.42 m1.31 m
Kia Clarus is smaller, but higher.
Kia Clarus is 32 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Clarus is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 424 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
764 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters12.1 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Clarus is 1.5 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means Kia Clarus can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`760~ 1`900
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data7400
Pros and Cons: Kia Clarus has
  • both manual and automatic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Jaguar XJ has
  • automatic transmission only
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv