Kia Clarus 1996 vs Jaguar XJ 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Kia Clarus is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Jaguar XJ is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Kia Clarus is available with front wheel drive, while Jaguar XJ can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 3.2 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 - 133 HP | 240 - 370 HP | |
Torque: | 152 - 171 NM | 316 - 525 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 13.9 seconds | 5.6 - 8.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 12.0 | 11.9 - 13.1 | |
Kia Clarus petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XJ. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 5.02 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.31 m | |
Kia Clarus is smaller, but higher. Kia Clarus is 32 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Clarus is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 424 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
764 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 12.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Clarus is 1.5 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means Kia Clarus can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`760 | ~ 1`900 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 7400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Clarus has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |