Kia Cerato 2004 vs Nissan Almera 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 248 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Kia Cerato and Nissan Almera have the same engine power, but Kia Cerato torque is 3 NM less than Nissan Almera. Kia Cerato reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Almera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Cerato consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Cerato could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Cerato consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Cerato might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Kia Cerato engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Kia Cerato is larger. Kia Cerato is 14 cm longer than the Nissan Almera, 3 cm wider, while the height of Kia Cerato is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 228 litres | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1046 litres | 1020 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Kia Cerato has 127 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera. This could mean that the Kia Cerato uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Cerato (by 26 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Almera. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`856 | 1`810 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |