Kia Cerato 2004 vs Mazda 3 2004

 
Kia Cerato
2004 - 2007
Mazda 3
2004 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 112 HP110 HP
Torque: 245 NM245 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds11.5 seconds
Kia Cerato engine produces 2 HP more power than Mazda 3, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.05.0
Real fuel consumption: 7.1 l/100km5.9 l/100km
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Kia Cerato consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Cerato could require 150 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Cerato consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle1100 km in combined cycle
1190 km on highway1270 km on highway
770 km with real consumption930 km with real consumption
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.34 m4.42 m
Width: 1.74 m1.76 m
Height: 1.47 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Kia Cerato is 8 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Cerato is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 228 litres300 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1046 litres635 litres
Kia Cerato has 72 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Cerato (by 411 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.1 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8561`785
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 10001200
Pros and Cons: Kia Cerato has
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv