Kia Cerato 2004 vs Hyundai Getz 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 88 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Kia Cerato is more dynamic to drive. Kia Cerato engine produces 24 HP more power than Hyundai Getz, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Hyundai Getz. Thanks to more power Kia Cerato reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Getz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Cerato consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Cerato could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Cerato consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato, Hyundai Matrix | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Cerato might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Kia Cerato is larger, but slightly lower. Kia Cerato is 52 cm longer than the Hyundai Getz, 8 cm wider, while the height of Kia Cerato is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 228 litres | 254 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1046 litres | 977 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Kia Cerato has 26 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. This could mean that the Kia Cerato uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Cerato (by 69 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.1 metres more than that of the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`856 | 1`575 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |