Kia Cerato 2006 vs Nissan Tiida 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
Diesel (Kia Cerato) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan Tiida) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 235 NM | 147 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
Kia Cerato engine produces 5 HP more power than Nissan Tiida, whereas torque is 88 NM more than Nissan Tiida. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.8 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 52 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.34 m | 4.30 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.54 m | |
Kia Cerato is larger, but lower. Kia Cerato is 5 cm longer than the Nissan Tiida, 5 cm wider, while the height of Kia Cerato is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 228 litres | 272 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 467 litres | |
Nissan Tiida has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia Cerato has 44 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Tiida. This could mean that the Kia Cerato uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Tiida. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`658 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Tiida has
| |