Kia Cerato 2004 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 NM | 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Kia Cerato engine produces 35 HP less power than Chrysler PT Cruiser, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Chrysler PT Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Kia Cerato reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Cerato is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Cerato consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means that by driving the Kia Cerato over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Cerato consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Cerato gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Eclipse, Chrysler Sebring | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Cerato might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Kia Cerato is larger, but lower. Kia Cerato is 5 cm longer than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 4 cm wider, while the height of Kia Cerato is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 228 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1046 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 1 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means Kia Cerato can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |