Kia Cerato 2004 vs Honda Civic 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 143 NM | 152 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
Honda Civic is a more dynamic driving. Kia Cerato engine produces 5 HP less power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Honda Civic. Due to the lower power, Kia Cerato reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Cerato consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Cerato could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Cerato consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
1000 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
640 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.34 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.50 m | |
Kia Cerato is larger, but slightly lower. Kia Cerato is 6 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 4 cm wider, while the height of Kia Cerato is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 228 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1046 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.5 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Kia Cerato can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Honda Civic has
| |