Kia Cerato 2004 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 121 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Kia Cerato engine produces 19 HP less power than Chrysler PT Cruiser, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Chrysler PT Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Kia Cerato reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Cerato is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Kia Cerato consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means that by driving the Kia Cerato over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Kia Cerato consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Cerato gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Hyundai Matrix | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Cerato might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.42 m | |
| Kia Cerato is 5 cm shorter than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 3 cm wider, while the height of Kia Cerato is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 228 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1046 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 1 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means Kia Cerato can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`815 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |