Kia Cerato 2004 vs Volvo C30 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo C30 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Cerato engine produces 7 HP less power than Volvo C30, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Volvo C30. Due to the lower power, Kia Cerato reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Hyundai Matrix | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S40, Volvo V50 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Cerato might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
| Kia Cerato is 9 cm longer than the Volvo C30, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Cerato is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 228 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1046 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo C30 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Kia Cerato uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo C30, which means Kia Cerato can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`815 kg | 1`780 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`290 kg | 1`373 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 525 kg | 407 kg | |
| Kia Cerato load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem more than Volvo C30. Therefore, Kia Cerato is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |