Kia Cerato 2004 vs Fiat Stilo 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Fiat Stilo is a more dynamic driving. Kia Cerato engine produces 13 HP less power than Fiat Stilo, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Fiat Stilo. Due to the lower power, Kia Cerato reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Kia Cerato consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo, which means that by driving the Kia Cerato over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Kia Cerato consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
| Kia Cerato is 9 cm longer than the Fiat Stilo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Cerato is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 228 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1046 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia Cerato is 0.4 metres less than that of the Fiat Stilo, which means Kia Cerato can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`815 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |