Kia Cerato 2012 vs Ford Mustang 2014

 
Kia Cerato
2012 - 2016
Ford Mustang
2014 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP309 HP
Torque: 194 NM407 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 secondsn/a seconds
Kia Cerato engine produces 159 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 213 NM less than Ford Mustang.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.2no data
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres59 litres

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Kia Cerato) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.53 m4.78 m
Width: 1.78 m1.92 m
Height: 1.42 m1.38 m
Kia Cerato is smaller, but slightly higher.
Kia Cerato is 25 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Cerato is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 433 litres408 litres
Kia Cerato has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Kia Cerato has 25 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. The Ford Mustang may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: no data12.2 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`265no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data28 800
Pros and Cons: Kia Cerato has
  • roomier boot
Ford Mustang has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv