Kia Cerato 2012 vs Kia Ceed 2013
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 194 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving. Kia Cerato engine produces 54 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 71 NM less than Kia Ceed. Due to the lower power, Kia Cerato reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.6 | |
|
The Kia Cerato is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Cerato consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that by driving the Kia Cerato over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai i40, Kia Optima | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Ceed might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Kia Cerato engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.47 m | |
| Kia Cerato is 17 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Cerato is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 433 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1318 litres | |
|
Kia Cerato has more luggage capacity. Kia Cerato has 53 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`242 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |