Kia Cerato 2010 vs Volvo V40 2015
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 194 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Kia Cerato engine produces 4 HP more power than Volvo V40, but torque is 56 NM less than Volvo V40. Despite the higher power, Kia Cerato reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 5.5 | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia Cerato consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia Cerato could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
| Kia Cerato is 11 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Kia Cerato is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 335 litres | |
|
Kia Cerato has more luggage capacity. Kia Cerato has 105 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia Cerato has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |